Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:54:23 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Warren Block <wblock@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r39908 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks Message-ID: <D231B199-A2CC-42BA-B93E-CB56B4FCEDED@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=LN82Cj%2ByTsiBSxuah0BNJpt4QkybaxWvp2z_pqaom%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211020413.qA24DfDZ040748@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgm2fmD0uJJ419B4FY9=_FOmbHSHfphngkHCz8-2Coodog@mail.gmail.com> <20121102133403.GA1352@glenbarber.us> <CAF6rxg=LN82Cj%2ByTsiBSxuah0BNJpt4QkybaxWvp2z_pqaom%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 2, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 2 November 2012 09:34, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> My 2 cents on this is, and always has been, that people (new >> contributors, in particular) tend to use the existing markup as a >> template for reference on how the document should be formatted. As >> such, correcting the existing, badly-formatted markup provides >> consistency to new contributors wanting to provide patches, but = unsure >> of what the "proper style" for these documents is. >=20 > Makes sense and I completely agree: in fact my mentors already have > some giant-whitespace-cleanup patches from me. >=20 > I was asking about our policy - and it seems I have a good answer. :) svn blame just becomes iterative. It isn't any different than /usr/src = API changes showing that jhb touched the failing line of code last, but = digging more you find it was someone else because jhb just did a api = sweep... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D231B199-A2CC-42BA-B93E-CB56B4FCEDED>