From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 7 23:27:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA26436 for current-outgoing; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 23:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA26429; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 23:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA25660; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 23:22:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 23:22:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Atipa cc: "John S. Dyson" , dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, ggm@connect.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI was: flags 80ff works (like anybody doubted it) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Atipa wrote: > My thoughts exactly. Depending on the card and driver level, SCSI is > actually slower in many cases. Similar IDE drives outperformed SCSIs Many cases? Only in command overhead. ... > > This is the result of my Hawk, SCSI drive, with an NCR 815 interface: > > > > Command overhead is 845 usec (time_4096 = 2071, time_8192 = 3297) > > transfer speed is 3.34201e+06 bytes/sec > > > > dd if=/dev/rsd0 of=/dev/null count=1600 bs=64k > > 1600+0 records in > > 1600+0 records out > > 104857600 bytes transferred in 27.336979 secs (3835742 bytes/sec) Hehe, I can do the above dd at 8738133 bytes/sec, on a NCR 810 (narrow!), with a Seagate Barracuda. Try to find a IDE drive that can do that. This is only a P120. Tom