From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 14 14:45:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310E3FDD for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013D913B8 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 14:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so74698631igb.1 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=qffyEnzMmc9fzscU1ecF37OKA9sO1vRq+vjuX6GNJzY=; b=EttCXuRoRAVreqrqiO0ieivNfGkN9M48Dpvsffl21paFHUM5Yc6URcqRt4GuX/upQw f5QxjuDYKbVbEhENQ2j3+Un6hgo5Uj2pr2goUykIBHWU7XYXrVoApZhPNev0c8Pw4UZ5 z/pqowcfZfRc4SdFHzIU+NGybTbvrgMIJUZO/PE6cUHeqTCYpKY9pgphjuHTJe7qrqL4 7qeZCQYySRkQWkqS1NFTyluzgA/F5E39dRKozHw0C1rXdrxXXhdZ/tP5gBk/i8YUixRw Y8fsgp39Ir32DM+xIr8yUoI+4BZHZ8EbpLWFlgn7OUFhCNjo4MYsJuOPr/32acDjU1be I2pQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGhvRZA1rMTCiPWiTl8UApAEKGp+Q4ifudOrHqHqG/Wdqp6u0lWjOVewqE4EDRzrE785hc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.204.14 with SMTP id fk14mr14813615icb.96.1431614713638; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.28.201 with HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1431610495.1880104.268703721.32988B01@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1EE88AD4-2B4A-496B-9366-7F9A89F57D6D@bsdimp.com> <1431610495.1880104.268703721.32988B01@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance issues with raspberry pi 2 From: Andreas Andersson Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:45:15 -0000 I can provide that, but I'd need to know what you would want me to benchmak. Would it suffice with my own benchmark of my simple tornado project or do you want benchmarks that shows how different parts of the system are performing? 2015-05-14 15:34 GMT+02:00 Mark Felder : > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 01:39, Andreas Andersson wrote: > > Just built an image for the raspberry pi without the witness options.. > > Will > > try to build with TARGET_ARCH=armv6hf later on. Eager to test the > > performance of tornadoweb on the rpi first. :) > > > > Will come back with benchmarks later. What else would be nice to > > benchmark? > > Is there a standard set of benchmarks that I can run and provide results > > for? > > > > I would be interested in seeing comparable benchmarks between Linux, > FreeBSD, and NetBSD on the rpi keeping the environments as similar as > possible. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >