From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec  5 13:46: 4 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E7F15428
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  5 Dec 1999 13:45:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA26864;
	Sun, 5 Dec 1999 16:45:45 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 16:45:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199912052145.QAA26864@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Leif Neland" <leif@neland.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Sv: mount(2) broken? 
In-Reply-To: <18864.944424852@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>
	<18864.944424852@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Sun, 05 Dec 1999 21:14:12 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> said:

> In message <003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>, "Leif Neland" writes:
>> Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?

> I'm actually starting to wonder about that too...

Um, the correct question would have been:

* Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by `make install' in a kernel
compilation directory?

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message