From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Jun 26 14:45: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06DF637B406 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:44:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 26 Jun 2001 22:44:56 +0100 (BST) To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pccard hangs in -stable (new problem in pcic.c r1.89.2.6) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:37:17 MDT." <200106262137.f5QLbHU09935@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:44:55 +0100 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200106262244.aa73609@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200106262137.f5QLbHU09935@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >Except that the registers that exist on the Vadem controllers don't >exist on any other kinds of bridges. Oops - but it was certainly the addition of the 'case PCIC_I82365:' that caused the new problems. Should the else setb(sp, PCIC_MISC1, PCIC_MISC1_VCC_33); just become something like else if (sp->controller != PCIC_I82365) setb(sp, PCIC_MISC1, PCIC_MISC1_VCC_33); instead in both cases? I should have been more specific in saying that I hadn't tested the proposed patch :-) Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message