Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:16:23 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: "arch@freebsd.org" <arch@FreeBSD.org>, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk Message-ID: <86fwybdkt4.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100819090128.22597bbvyogdw9wk@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:01:28 %2B0200") References: <E604222D-A731-4F0E-BF21-FF7F4306A899@gmail.com> <AANLkTimCdcBvgBt1sr2y1_=6fOEGWFFxa=hRwQ5vzyhT@mail.gmail.com> <65F17C45-55C1-4349-A4D1-A3D6AD0D9A80@FreeBSD.org> <4C6C1EB1.5000004@FreeBSD.org> <20100819090128.22597bbvyogdw9wk@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > If someone would get icc 11.x up and runnig as a port (similar to what > we have for outdated icc version in the ports collection), I would > have a look if my contact at Intel is still working there in a > position which allows him to get a commercial license for us. Does that really matter? We're not going to start building releases with icc, are we? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fwybdkt4.fsf>