From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 27 07:29:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA06420 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 07:29:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horton.iaces.com (proot@horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA06415 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 07:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from proot@localhost) by horton.iaces.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA28230; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:28:59 -0500 (CDT) From: "Paul T. Root" Message-Id: <199708271428.JAA28230@horton.iaces.com> Subject: Re: Smart UPS -- any experts out there? To: patrick@cre8tivegroup.com (Patrick Gardella) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:28:59 -0500 (CDT) Cc: conrads@neosoft.com, dbaker@neosoft.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from Patrick Gardella at "Aug 27, 97 09:21:43 am" X-Organization: !nterprise Networking Services - ACES X-Phone: (612) 663-1979 X-Fax: (612) 663-8030 X-Page: (800) SKY-PAGE PIN: 537-7270 X-Address: 200 S. 5th St., Suite 1100 X-Address: Minneapolis, MN 55402 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In a previous message, Patrick Gardella said: > I'm running a SmartUPS from APS with UPSd (see below) for FreeBSD. Aside > from some annoying console messages that I haven't taken the time to redirect, > it works fine. (Paul Root was working on this, back in March (see List > Archives) but I don't know if he solved it.) I recompiled the upsd source, with local3 instead of daemon (?) and removed local3 from /var/log/messages and console. And added: !upsd local3.* /var/log/upsd.log And that fills upsd.log but messages and console still get that stupid, badly worded "negative response - No" messages. Grrr. I doubt I'll be working on it further. Our machines are moving into a computer room with a big UPS. Hurray. Paul. -- "The proper way to deal with the Jehovah's Witness is a Claymore or Bouncing Betty-type anti-personnel weapon. Sadly city ordinances preclude this." -Vicent Fox