From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 19:08:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACFD16A4CE; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:08:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655D743D3F; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:08:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marks@ripe.net) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id EA1692528B; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:08:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B9F250E4; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:08:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from ripe.net (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with SMTP id iAGJ83LE023390; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:08:03 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 2028 invoked by uid 1001); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:08:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:08:03 +0100 From: Mark Santcroos To: Franz Klammer Message-ID: <20041116190803.GC736@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20041115211636.GA1540@laptop.6bone.nl> <3183.213.147.173.194.1100622599.squirrel@mail.webonaut.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3183.213.147.173.194.1100622599.squirrel@mail.webonaut.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.000207 / -5.9 X-RIPE-Signature: 2408c6b86b2a17b6bb1fac1a44baad5d cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Please test: new ACPI release (20041105) import X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:08:34 -0000 On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:29:59PM +0100, Franz Klammer wrote: > does this patch also work with 5.3 or only with -CURRENT? It probably wouldn't be too hard to get it to work for 5.3 in case of this particular patch. In general I don't know yet what the policy will be regarding 5-STABLE and ACPI. Mark -- RIPE NCC - Delft University of Technology - The FreeBSD Project marks@ripe.net - m.a.santcroos@ewi.tudelft.nl - marks@freebsd.org