From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  7 07:27:33 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3001065672;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2011 07:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6201E14FB1E;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2011 07:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EB78865.8080106@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:27:33 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es>
	<j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net>
	<4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org>
	<4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org> <4EB78803.7060102@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EB78803.7060102@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:27:33 -0000

On 11/06/2011 23:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/11/2011 01:04 Doug Barton said the following:
>> Of course, the best solution by far is to set WRKDIRPREFIX to a path
>> with adequate space, preferably something other than /usr/obj.
> 
> Why is that?  Just because portmaster tries to do some magic under
> ${WRKDIRPREFIX} as opposed to ${WRKDIRPREFIX}/${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports} ? :-)

Partly, yes. Mostly because mixing src stuff and ports stuff is a bad idea.



-- 

		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
		"Too practical."

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/