From owner-freebsd-security Sat Jul 6 15:29:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA08166 for security-outgoing; Sat, 6 Jul 1996 15:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bacata ([200.21.26.62]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA08160 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 1996 15:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unalslip.usc.unal.edu.co by bacata (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA21801; Sat, 6 Jul 1996 17:31:15 +0500 Message-ID: <31DF04A4.287F@biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co> Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 17:28:20 -0700 From: Pedro Giffuni S Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: security@freebsd.org Subject: C2 security Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I found this message from about three years ago: ________________________________________________________________________C2 security for BSD/386 Brian Beattie (beattie@agora.rain.com) Fri, 30 Apr 93 15:16:13 PDT Somebody asked if BSD/386 had C2 security. It is my understanding that BSDI had no plans for C2. I am curious, how much interset is there in C2 security. Being the main engineer of the Trusted MINIX project I have often considered bring BSD/386 up toi C2. While I do not have the resources to handle the eval process I could certainly do the development and documentation. Anybody care? -- Brian Beattie | Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, | for you are crunchy and taste good with beattie@agora.rain.com | catsup. ________________________________________________________________________