Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 19:05:02 +0100 From: nox@jelal.hb.north.de (Juergen Lock) To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, koen@win.tue.nl, tlayton@global-sol.com Subject: Re: afio-2.4.2 port update Message-ID: <Mutt.19961118190502.nox@saturn.hb.north.de> In-Reply-To: <199611180854.JAA02859@wsooti20.win.tue.nl>; from Koen Holtman on Nov 18, 1996 09:54:28 %2B0100 References: <199611100812.JAA10455@saturn.hb.north.de> <199611180854.JAA02859@wsooti20.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Koen Holtman writes: > nox@jelal.hb.north.de: Ooops one of the Ccs was little bogus, i hope the gnats receiver didn't get too confused by that message... :) > > New version, please test... > > I looked at the patch files, and they seem correctness-preserving to > me. > > I don't understand why the st_mode -> PSt_mode renaming stuff is > necessary though. Does it resolve a clash with predefined > preprocessor macro names? Yes all(?) 4.4 BSD descendands do something like struct timespec st_atimespec; /* time of last access */ struct timespec st_mtimespec; /* time of last data modification */ struct timespec st_ctimespec; /* time of last file status change */ and then #define st_atime st_atimespec.ts_sec #define st_mtime st_mtimespec.ts_sec #define st_ctime st_ctimespec.ts_sec in <sys/stat.h> (to allow for better than one second resolution.) > I could change the auxiliary variable names > in a future afio 2.4.3 for Linux if that would help with the next > port. well sounds like a good idea. especially for other BSD trees that don't use the FreeBSD port system... > > Koen. > (maintainer of afio 2.4.x for Linux) thanx and cheers, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19961118190502.nox>