From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Wed Jul  9 10:09:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-multimedia>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA25178
          for multimedia-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA25171
          for <freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from East.Sun.COM ([129.148.1.241]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id KAA14642; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:35:31 -0700
Received: from suneast.East.Sun.COM by East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id NAA03860; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:08:51 -0400
Received: from compound.east.sun.com by suneast.East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA17405; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:08:51 -0400
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.east.sun.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA06211; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 12:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 12:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Reply-To: Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM
Message-Id: <199707091709.MAA06211@compound.east.sun.com>
From: Tony Kimball <Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com
Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vat on sb16? 
References: <19970709105848.60794@crh.cl.msu.edu>
	<199707091621.JAA16772@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Face: O9M"E%K;(f-Go/XDxL+pCxI5<W_e*r7B8ojMD.5+qDgOp4/\gTQEgbOoBqf:Vtl*aW:<;9/
	UIVk'U^XhYg+v#r~*X<$Q=_ik@5:%E}pl]9|9|:]WLW8n:fLgg0~cfwWRBQxK/HSG0b1D/gljJC$qp
	b=HDF@+"H<|fXy`w#$8#6A"!F:>*gr[=FN@Y`cl1.Tn
Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Amancio Hasty on Wed, 9 July:
: The SB thingies have two main problems lack of full duplex dma and
: a decent clock.

There are full-duplex windows drivers for the SB16.  Do they fake it?
There was once some talk of a Linux full-duplex driver but (to my
knowledge) it got nowhere because supposedly Hannu was doing it.
(This was before the commercialization of OSS.)  Does anyone know:
Did full-duplex SB support make it into OSS?