From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Mon Oct 30 08:06:13 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25381E56F0D;
 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:06:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B317CBC4;
 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:06:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (124-148-77-206.dyn.iinet.net.au
 [124.148.77.206]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v9U85v2c088182
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 01:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Subject: Re: Crypto overhaul
To: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net>,
 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org>
Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>,
 Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>,
 "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
References: <dc08792a-3215-611c-eb9f-4936a0d621f9@metricspace.net>
 <CAG5KPzws=jmF2wLeEAz8Lzn7Ugude=0w5neoQjeDjYnGtJpS9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk>
 <CAG5KPzxGtAwV-svCv24FbZtLvxKCwX7OSyb2pPaTc63EUmFFGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org>
 <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk>
 <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>
 <24228.1509196559@critter.freebsd.dk>
 <df46aaa5-13a9-2fc6-bcd2-d57d792800eb@metricspace.net>
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <e83f9add-d6d4-494d-669a-215765c0b5eb@elischer.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:05:50 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <df46aaa5-13a9-2fc6-bcd2-d57d792800eb@metricspace.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:06:13 -0000

On 29/10/17 8:36 am, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> --------
>> In message <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes:
>>
>>> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count,
>>> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch.
>> While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope
>> FreeBSD has higher ambitions.
>>
> I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option.

what gives any evidence as to it being any better?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"