From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 13 01:03:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2359106566B for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com (mail-fx0-f228.google.com [209.85.220.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468D38FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so450409fxm.13 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:03:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZgVF05X9L/7XVdLrHYyChbVU7rUDcc79gZNuXuFOTcw=; b=tyYVqbPmkApUGK+uWIatlgOWrA50cdwhqBYJMBMMcupXmLbcUj8QERp38/Wfe4cuPU RzkUkY5Z8Uu2X7ZKGjEZRMbgTAY1+8BgSLlM0kCzyJ3+KrTIZpq3VtJQ33iyg1g1eN7Y zQTQrDcBMCVcEWdOS+ZXUNsEttQbVCzghIero= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LSZnh6zY5r90MyV9sPaomsedAS4Z0W+k9CIPFwC2S525Dv4KvCFoedFJTy55DXNXb6 O1scf/8mAqnGzOuZfMLZbC4d/C2Qn5sV88wjferXF9f1mYtaTzIK7t+G0zqxg1rYho4z M1MAGBHvmhxAu4xNPejmqPNNqc1W7M7c0mvBc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.216 with SMTP id 24mr3444052fas.67.1260666226043; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:03:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B2433E4.2040809@lazlarlyricon.com> References: <20091210144141.GB834@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091210095122.a164bf95.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20091212.163352.850602504923947435.imp@bsdimp.com> <11167f520912121544j471e2f15oc2b2bdba926b46ab@mail.gmail.com> <4B2433E4.2040809@lazlarlyricon.com> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:03:45 +0200 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Rolf Nielsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Sam Fourman Jr." , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root exploit for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:03:47 -0000 http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120 On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >>> >>> Are you sure that OpenBSD has a better record? >> >> >> I found this for loose reference. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD#Security_and_code_auditing >> >> I will say that even though on the surface OpenBSD appears to have a >> better track record security wise >> I tend to use FreeBSD for my desktop needs because of things like >> Nvidia Graphics (esp now that there is amd64 support) > > Where's that? The Nvidia site says nothing about it yet, and the makefile > for x11/nvidia-driver still says ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386. I'm eagerly waiting > for it, but I can't find anything other than a forum post (I don't have the > address handy at this computer, but I know it's somewhere in the mailing > list archive) from Zander at Nvidia corporation saying it's on its way. > >> also wine works in FreeBSD and some of my clinets still run windows apps. >> >> I find FreeBSD is the middle ground the world needs between Linix and >> OpenBSD >> >> Sam Fourman Jr. >> Fourman Networks >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >