From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 19:38:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FA6106566C; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8373B8FC17; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A6814E5CE1; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:29:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aMuNXVSwRNtl; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.232.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAB7B14D28F0; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E442D94.1010209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:29:24 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Hellenthal References: <20110809081842.GA64643@freebsd.org> <20110810030257.GA31452@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20110810030257.GA31452@DataIX.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:38:25 -0000 Em 2011.08.10. 5:02, Jason Hellenthal escreveu: > So has the maintainer of bsdgrep updated it yet so these things do not > happen ?, if not (and apparently not) I don't understand why you are > explicitly defaulting your gnugrep to a broken bsdgrep. This was a known > problem a few months back and I for one have not seen updates on that > yet. > I don't remember of this bug but I may have missed it. Could you tell me where did you see it? I'm very thankful to Alexander for using the "buggy BSD grep" because he helped fixing a bug. Criticizing is the easiest option but probably not the best. Gabor Kovesdan