From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 19 21:36:24 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE9D1065673
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:36:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DDD8FC28
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p0JLVv73024879
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:31:57 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Message-ID: <4D37584D.6060305@bsdimp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:31:57 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
References: <AANLkTimMsy9J5Ohj0pifZ+9L4_mFq5z2FwUhG8y5+3Kh@mail.gmail.com>
	<201101191559.07713.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201101191559.07713.jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Weed-whacking sysctl(8)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:36:24 -0000

On 01/19/2011 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> I guess I fail to see why sysctl giving a hint about the semantic type of
> the data ("temperature", "struct foo") which is separate from the "physical"
> type (e.g. 32-bit or 64-bit) is such a bad thing.

Yes.  Especially since the data could be degrees C, degrees F or some 
other weirdness.  You can't divorce the semantic interpretation of the 
data from the data type.  Both are important to interpret this data 
correctly.

I'm in the "IK isn't icky enough to rototill" camp.

Warner