From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Feb 27 19:33:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DA037B402; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11185; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:32:44 +1100 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:33:15 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Kelly Yancey Cc: Bob Van Valzah , Robert Watson , Jorge Aldana , Garance A Drosihn , Subject: Re: Performance vs. Stable In-Reply-To: <20020227121320.X8086-100000@gateway.posi.net> Message-ID: <20020228143126.P51203-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Kelly Yancey wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > > > > Processor, Processes - factor slower than the best > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > I think you are misinterpreting them. The non-starrd results are > > absolute times. E.g., they say that the "null" syscall takes 6.1 usec > > in 4.5-S and 6.1 usec in -current. This is about right. The "null" > > ... > > I know I am going out on a limb to doubt you, but are you sure? The chart No. I just didn't believe the results, and conveniently forgot the details of their annotation. See the followup for corrected results. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message