Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:06:00 +0300 (EEST)
From:      Alexander V Zubchenko <stalker@hermes-comp.zp.ua>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: SysAdm docs
Message-ID:  <20020611155409.H89846-100000@server.hermes-comp.zp.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20020611110329.GB41922@hades.hell.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings!

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

> That's still a bit of lacking in information.
>
> + Are you running a web server?
> + What software are you using for that web server?
> + Are those domains that you listed above configured as 'virtual domains'?
> + What are the relevant parts of your configuration files for them?
> + Are you using a log file with your web server?
> + When the problem pops up, is there anything interesting in your logs?
This is really my bad english. With my site all is ok. I can't reach
some sites outside in the Internet. I'm not running this url's. I want
to surf them.

>
> > *timeout*
> >  _sendmail_
>
> > Jun  5 00:10:48 server sendmail[36649]: g54KAmq36649: \
> > to=<sale@hermes-comp.zp.ua>, delay=01:00:00, pri=30000, \
> > stat=timeout waiting for input during message collect
>
> Hmmm.  This looks like your Sendmail stops getting any data after a
> while.  Could it be that you have some firewall that blocks packets
> after a while? (After, for instance, a dynamic rule expires.)
No, i run firewall only for natd and bandwidth-management (i
want to check prepared configuration of firewall itself before i'll
turn it on. And check more than one time). In fact my firewall as 4
now looks like this:
ipfw add divert...
ipfw add pipe 1...
ipfw pipe 1 configure...
ipfw add 65000 allow ip from any to any (as You know, of course,
default in kernel is 65535 deny ip from any to any, and i don't want
to change this default).

> Cool :) Yet another happy Postfix user.  I know a lot of people who
> have found Postfix easier to configure and having no need for those
> extra bits of Sendmail, use it happily for a long time, and then
> forget all about mail servers.  Glad you got it working so quickly ;)
Thx. It's really cool and easy

>
> > I add there above log lines. And i log all smtp traffic. From my side
> > this looks like client send DATA, server (mine) reply with 354 and
> > after that.. nothing. Silence from client side before timeout. That is
> > for timeout which looks like timeout in both sendmail and postfix.
> > After timeout my server send to client '421 Error: timeout exceeded'
> > After that connection is closed w/o QUIT command.
>
> This doesn't look right.  After the 354 responce, the client should
> immediatelly start writing the message to you.  Unless of course,
> something is blocking the client.  If you are using some sort of
> firewall, what is its configuration?  What rules does it use to pass
> or block packets?
Yes i know. And end with single dot. But it don't. And connection must
not b closed by client or server. Only server close connection after
receiving QUIT cmd. And after replying with '221...' But connection is
closed abnormally.

>
> > In case, when sendmail reported premature EOM, all is similar, but
> > after '421...' client reply with QUIT and connection is closed.
In this case, as You can see, all is OK. As described in rfc (of
course, i forget to add this info, my server reply with 221).


Alexander V Zubchenko,		E-Mail: stalker@hermes-comp.zp.ua
System Administrator,		WWW: http://www.hermes-comp.zp.ua/
Hermes-comp,
Ukraine,
Zaporizhzhya,
Geroev Stalingrada 50
phone/fax: +380 612 64-19-72



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020611155409.H89846-100000>