Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:15:09 +0900 (JST) From: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files patch-i102679 Message-ID: <20090724.151509.460114267490804990.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0907240111180.9509@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20090722104843.4C7C539843@qat.tcbug.org> <20090723.100400.623571555980913508.chat95@mac.com> <alpine.LSU.1.99.0907240111180.9509@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Gerald, Of course using gcc42 from the ports tree is a nice idea, and note that this happens conditionally :-( not all cases. Best, From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-RC/files patch-i102679 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:16:28 +0200 (CEST) > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi, * (add Gerald, a gcc guru) > > You are being kind, Maho-san. :-) > >> I investigated a bit and this is a bug of gcc. > > I looked into the log, and understand this is our system compiler. My > recommendation is to see whether this also occurs with lang/gcc42 (that > is, setting USE_GCC=4.2 in the port), lang/gcc43, or lang/gcc44. > This may be a very valid case where going for the ports compiler, a > recommendation I have heard from obrien and others, sounds like a good > idea and as you have seen I have started to push to get things cleaned > up for lang/gcc44 even. If lang/gcc44 works for you, GCC 4.4.1 has just > been released upstream and I would hope this to be a longer term solution; > otherwise lang/gcc43. > > Gerald >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090724.151509.460114267490804990.chat95>