From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 13:24:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6E7ED8 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BA48FC16 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TV0BL-0004Ul-Md for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 05:24:07 -0800 Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 05:24:07 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1352035447442-5757907.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net> References: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net> Subject: Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:24:09 -0000 Imho, at least wiki page (http://wiki.freebsd.org/) on setting up FreeBSD on SSDs is needed. Lots of confusion and different opinions (sector size!)... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-is-SU-J-undesirable-on-SSDs-tp5757733p5757907.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.