Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:09:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193211] [stage ]ports-mgmt/bxpkg request maintainership Message-ID: <bug-193211-13-09uDng7nsD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193211-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193211-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193211 --- Comment #6 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #5) > (In reply to John Marino from comment #4) > > After giving up asking for poudriere, I repeatedly requested output of: > > > > make check-plist > > make stage-qa > > make check-sanity > > portlint > > > > Not once did you comply. > > It's untested. > > > > > > I don't accept redports because as we have seen many times, it does not > > check gross plist errors. It's essentially worthless for staging. It's > > only good to check on all platforms after staging is confirmed. > > > > So yes, in this context it's untested. and you didn't even give links to > > redports before so...? > > > > If you don't provide proof, it didn't happen. > > > > > > The other thing about this port you did not address: > > It only works with pkg_* tools which were removed today, so why on earth > > would you try to save it? I thought you had specific reasons for specific > > ports but I cannot see any reason for this. > > I'm currently attempting to setup a _proper_ poudriere_ environment > to accommodate all of your requests/demands. So you don't understand that make check-plist make stage-qa make check-sanity portlint doesn't require poudriere? that you run those commands from the port itself? e.g. instead of "make install" you type "make check-sanity" ? > I understand that you > [perhaps rightfully so] reject redports as adequate. Fair enough. But > if you find/decide there are still issues with any of my submission(s). > Then just say so, and mark them, as such. I'll resolve them, and things > will continue to move on (ahead). As intended. IMHO I see no reason > to flatly reject everything I submit. and that's the problem. You don't realize that the stuff you are submitting is below acceptable. It's at a level that indicates that you have fundamental issues with the concept of staging and haven't followed the instructions of the staging link that I gave you (that you should have had long ago) It appears that you actually have no idea what the problems are even though I have spelled out EXACTLY why it was getting rejected. > The [my] submissions are not > _completely_ w/o merit. I have already vowed to resolve any outstanding > issues. As history has shown, I _do_ do so. Perhaps not in your > [desired] time frame. But, until I get poudriere setup properly, > I am forced to do the best I can, with what I have. No, you aren't. I asked you to stop submitting new ports. It was clear at that time there were major conceptional issues that needed to be resolved and continuing to submit grossly wrong patches were a waste of your time and our time. I've spent quite a bit of time personally with you and you've heeded none of my advice. Since you seem earnest, I have to assume that's not intentional, but rather a lack of understanding. I can't believe you didn't ready *anything* I've written in the last few weeks (your actions indicate you haven't read a word, but I find that hard to believe that's actually the case) You really need to step back and re-read literally everything I've written on all these PRs, and keep until you understand what I'm talking about. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193211-13-09uDng7nsD>