From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 21 21:55:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA11455 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 21:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from argus.flash.net (root@[206.149.24.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA11446 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 21:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from lists@localhost) by argus.flash.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA03681; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 23:53:38 -0600 From: mailing list account Message-Id: <199601220553.XAA03681@argus.flash.net> Subject: Re: Windows 95 Compatability To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 23:53:37 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Doug White" at Jan 21, 96 03:29:37 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In reply: > > SIMTEL-20.WSMR.ARMY.MIL is no more... what happened, did the Army/Congress > > drop funding? I haven't been able to get to simtel for a couple of years > > now... > > Try oak.oakland.edu instead, or a local mirror. > > simtel was bought out by Coast Communications Inc some time ago. > Besides that, the root simtel machine was a bear to use I heard... not really, just S-L-O-W... it didn't used to be too bad, but by the early 90's it was almost as slow as accessing ftp.uni-paderborn.de [home of the 60 baud FTP] was then, or ftp.uu.net is today. Jim -- All opinions expressed are mine, if you | "I will not be pushed, stamped, think otherwise, then go jump into turbid | briefed, debriefed, indexed, or radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!! | numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner" jbryant@argus.flash.net - FlashNet Communications - Ft. Worth, Texas