From owner-freebsd-chat Thu May 23 07:07:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA14178 for chat-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA14167 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA00695; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:06:44 -0700 (PDT) To: Paul Richards cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith), nawaz921@cs.uidaho.edu, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, freebsd-chat@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 May 1996 14:13:18 BST." <199605231313.OAA23966@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 07:06:44 -0700 Message-ID: <693.832860404@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > initiation procedure for getting into unix, I'm trying to get the point > across that changing the editor isn't going to change the fundamental > nature of what unix is, it just prolongs the point before people > realise what they're getting in to. And in that way, putting a nice face on UNIX is like marriage, Paul. You don't need to keep up the facade all the way, just long enough to get the user in past the point of no return. :-) Jordan