Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:47:09 -0500 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE testing with "late" tool? Message-ID: <20040305184709.GA3892@crodrigues.org> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040305010434.03677bc0@gid.co.uk> References: <20040129000559.GA54451@crodrigues.org> <20040305003347.GA98548@crodrigues.org> <6.0.3.0.2.20040305010434.03677bc0@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:08:44AM +0000, Bob Bishop wrote: > Um, have a look in http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/, > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/late.tgz looks promising. Thanks, this looks like it. I was wondering, who is actively involved with measuring scheduler performance on FreeBSD? FreeBSD scheduler gurus may want to take a look at the Hourglass tool written by John Regehr at University of Utah: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/hourglass/ Hourglass has been used to measure scheduler performance on Linux, FreeBSD 4.x, and Windows 2000. Thanks. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc@crodrigues.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040305184709.GA3892>