From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 22:42:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7655A106564A for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0578FC19 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDSK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m32Mg6cG032164; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:43:06 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 In-Reply-To: <20080402082138.29215ikf830zxu8g@mail.top-consulting.net> Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:42:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > freebsd@top-consulting.net > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:22 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping > > > I think you guys went a bit on a tangent here. What I am trying to do > is limit the outbound bandwidth of my services and this should be > perfectly possible as I control the output. > Considering you didn't say that in your original post I don't see why your complaining about a tangent. Ted