From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 24 16:51:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A217106566B; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B388FC12; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so13932226vcb.13 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:51:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O4kZTjvAzwzmDhK30T6Q1Op5vpESrycxUukTFD+f5ik=; b=saL1lntPAe4+vNiL4eg9aWnMZAprb5ccvR0qAtIeFg7rIFG2rGYm3aLpM8M0V8wdHQ eEr1caDW7ae+HGc8cfUoN+VnG52S0Mbwe4hFMmglaIGCT9BFKq2DX0eYzv0ri53zWCzL DWnwHTyvSfYus8cj5vZWwNDicSztLbNugYTds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.213.137 with SMTP id gw9mr11512501vcb.3.1324745470332; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:51:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:51:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7C00F287-AE0B-4621-8428-E6A6E3BDA084@digsys.bg> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <20111215215554.GA87606@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20111222005250.GA23115@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20111222103145.GA42457@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20111222184531.GA36084@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4EF37E7B.4020505@FreeBSD.org> <20111222194740.GA36796@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20111223191146.GA56232@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <7C00F287-AE0B-4621-8428-E6A6E3BDA084@digsys.bg> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:51:09 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: isqg-uQsttEjAlQvQaXym_OoGHU Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Daniel Kalchev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon , Steve Kargl Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:51:11 -0000 My rule is "break it any way you can and see if you can figure out why." Don't be discouraged. You may find some of the folk at yahoo are interested. Adrian On 24 December 2011 03:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Do you not have access to anything with 8 CPUs in it? It'd be nice to >> get clarification that this indeed was fixed. > > I offered to do tests on 4x8 core Opteron system (32 cores total), but was discouraged that contention would be too much and results meaningless -- yet, such systems will be more and more popular. > >> Does ULE care (much) if the nodes are hyperthreading or real cores? >> Would that play a part in what it tries to schedule/spread? > > I could also run the tests on 2x4x2 cores Xeon, which uses hyper threading, 8 real or 16 virtual cores in total. > > I can torture both systems (actually two pairs) for a week or two. But I may not have enough time to prepare the core/setup so any advice is greatly appreciated. Be more descriptive :) > > Daniel