From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 18:03:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038DE106564A; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50C8FC08; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id pB1I2dp4073729; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:02:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1322762560; bh=Y9iFb2V/nbk0W3VvGC2XeNz/WKm3oFMyEQovjV65XC8=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=miV6AZlxU3wbAmG8Ic7TW7NI68+/tw0gOFnliG70NeCfwIYNeHB9vCcIVdUU+B1oN r1dymzvCKvy7HbTfEgXPd27HloiJ337blirJ2Y7ri3F9fcI8STqFNyr6x1N/ufU8mu SJfNZJsQYb5ddy4xap2Ypt1F4tmuD2VhWw47iA4w= From: Sean Bruno To: Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <201111301855.27646.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <1322695365.2764.9.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4ED6BF01.2080602@FreeBSD.org> <201111301855.27646.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:02:39 -0800 Message-ID: <1322762559.2776.0.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "sbruno@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" , Gapon , Andriy Subject: Re: Console Spam: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-73.0C) [solved] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:03:04 -0000 On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:55 -0800, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following: > > > I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty > > > bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this > > > spam? > > > > Ask on acpi@ list. > > Kidding :-) or not. > > Try hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate=0. > > Adding the following line in /boot/loader.conf will disable > acpi_thermal(4) completely: > > debug.acpi.disabled="thermal" > > Jung-uk Kim Aye, both are my "huckleberry". Thanks! Sean