From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 22:18:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CE116A428 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C77E43D53 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2OMIA8K041150; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:18:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Oleg Sharoiko Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:18:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060215102749.D58480@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <200603241607.55075.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060325003610.J11600@brain.cc.rsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060325003610.J11600@brain.cc.rsu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603241718.49362.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1356/Fri Mar 24 13:41:06 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, Andrey Beresovsky Subject: Re: Boot hangs on ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:18:19 -0000 On Friday 24 March 2006 16:54, Oleg Sharoiko wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, John Baldwin wrote: > > JB>> 345,000 interrupts from scpi0 seems high. > JB>Yeah, I guess it might be. It's smaller than the bge interrupt storm > JB>number. :) > > I just didn't let it generate that many interrupts. I send break sooner > than in bge case. :) > > JB>Yeah, level/high seems weird. Try setting either > JB>'hw.acpi.sci.trigger=edge' or 'hw.acpi.sci.polarity=low' from the loader > JB>to see if that makes your machine happier. > > Ok. I will. As soon as I poweroff/poweron that box. I played with > different kernels and booted one which don't support breaking into DDB > from serial line. :( > > I've found an interesting thread on netbsd mailing list. > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2006/03/ > With subject "Re: Bug in x86 ioapic interrupt code for devices with shared > interrupts?". May this relate to my problems? Well, there is one possibly interesting patch for bge in there, (the one from the linux driver) but I'm not sure if it would really help or not. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org