From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 14:20:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1048216A41F for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5DB43D53 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:20:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j71EKL1b046259 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j71EKKJV046258; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:20:20 GMT Message-Id: <200508011420.j71EKKJV046258@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Cc: Subject: Re: docs/84265: chmod(1) manpage omits implication of setting w on directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Gary W. Swearingen" List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:20:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/84265; it has been noted by GNATS. From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/84265: chmod(1) manpage omits implication of setting w on directory Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 07:18:47 -0700 Giorgos Keramidas writes: > Does that look ok? Some will think it says too much, or says it in the wrong manpage, but it looks good to me. (I'd probably delete "by design...need to".) I hope you include this in the same para as your other sentence. BTW, I forgot that you might just be commenting on the PR and it might not be assigned to you (yet?). Unless I hear otherwise, I'll just forget about it for a while and see later whether I need to do more with it, like write (small?) patches for chown & chgrp, which I'm now thinking should probably refer to this rather extensive explanation in chmod. Unless you think it needn't be mentioned anywhere else.