From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 14 14:51:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2BC1065670; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [64.13.141.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5268FC18; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail2.meer.net (mail2.meer.net [64.13.141.16]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id n4EEaPNE080782; Thu, 14 May 2009 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from 2-196.dhcp.neophilic.net (faustus.neophilic.net [64.81.247.227]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.meer.net (8.14.1/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4EEaOMC024782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 May 2009 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Message-Id: <9CCFD49C-C5B3-4C45-BA74-AC29CF1F0EDA@neville-neil.com> From: George Neville-Neil To: Qing Li In-Reply-To: <200905140527.n4E5R9Lj078250@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:36:24 -0700 References: <200905140527.n4E5R9Lj078250@svn.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r192085 - head/sys/netinet X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:51:31 -0000 On May 13, 2009, at 22:27 , Qing Li wrote: > Author: qingli > Date: Thu May 14 05:27:09 2009 > New Revision: 192085 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/192085 > > Log: > Ignore the INADDR_ANY address inserted/deleted by DHCP when > installing a loopback route > to the interface address. > Hi, Can you give more detail as to the purpose of this change? I'm a bit confused by it. Does this fix any of the recent problems seen with DHCP and PXE or is this unrelated? Best, George