Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:09:01 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Cc:        awhawks@ibm.net, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is 802.3 supported?
Message-ID:  <199703241709.KAA22902@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199703241510.KAA13525@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Mar 24, 97 10:10:19 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have a NE2000 card and a IBM 9229 Token-Ring to Ethernet bridge which 
> > currently talks to everything fine except for my FreeBSD Box. I finaly 
> > found in the docs that the default is Ethernet-II protocol. Can I set
> > something in the kernel that will make it use 802.3 (like the bidge) 
> > instead?
> 
> No.  It's not actually very hard to do this, but we are unfortunately
> out of interface flags at the moment which you might set to
> enable/disable such translation.
> 
> If you'd like to try to change the code yourself, you need to look in
> net/if_ethersubr.c at the function ether_output().  Rather than
> filling in the Ethertype in the header, you'll need to put the packet
> length there and folllow the Ethernet header with hex 'aa aa 03 00 00
> 00' and the Ethertype.  This also means that the MTU of each interface
> would be reduced to 1494 from 1500 (one of the reasons why 802.2
> encapsulation is rarely used under IP).

Doesn't the FDDI interface use 802.3 encapsulation?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703241709.KAA22902>