From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 8 04:42:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AEAA159B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svysh.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15256E5B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svysh.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 11779AA1598; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBE6AA1595 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svysh.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E8FE5A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svysh.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x232.google.com with SMTP id xk3so138530182obc.2 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:42:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=riNpeYF5+WvzX6WGgjibZz5NXeHHFDOCPd+hgZG2I3w=; b=Vmzd/TMghvsPhuXlG5/nm7MgyUyvQb7CzsV/cFyXLitt7cExJAkzVTRmpVn1nwPcZ8 zGcn0Yn8nReRwVLMvR6d/JAk4sbzQ6xHeMI3PY/00fzUgVbskjoKQ4BWRy0f7RfxIFdS Hrm8cXOlICJzR5tx7jnBSixYAiNKxq7/kuZG7khJM03E093ufDV0nsaZETnzhQOGala9 FMtDxwTzzyN5wSsCFwmHJDJM/XSbrQWSD7zz0/7es1boK3pwR2WZy01wAOrUY6jK4tIk d71zsKrR51X5KmDoqmsNaBsa8sS64dukm/OsiT4+OlqF/oO0AU5PCwvjPWxLq+YhCfHK CKxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=riNpeYF5+WvzX6WGgjibZz5NXeHHFDOCPd+hgZG2I3w=; b=Ry55zYRYWEZ13SvBnE9QRVBlAZ+DevxkbQq3/eBj8b5iSwgRJ4ZEtg+tZhqo58YUc8 SzSR8ZGZ819jd6FXfDetXhtOVpP5OygnaSmkIafFUb14cWMxnFJCSjhuXEKZBfS8iN90 Xv413eA7F7DsotNxupcckWI+gIVAq2JlRdymZHs86vAb1+tnnN8uYN5kU9JBENhjpvNr gZMrGaNP/OLUQOdJas4osxwbPy9DojzUqnkoQpxJijGSM6Te7i6/g9wUr5Cb8ZSWw5FJ dmFV9vbuKZG2Xw44pE8BytLW7NtNupDwBEEXbFq6Xwo1uycetKoO64pYc9m7RI+RyLij 9CHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQawQMSdOJ8Rso3s0xGwfUOY0tYolDdIhqWef6NsnI2YYOBc/yWKMIRPsWkt2ecqaSITLMapzG9SLiAPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.142.170 with SMTP id rx10mr22799477obb.34.1454906576930; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.71.133 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:42:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56B80099.3070606@a1poweruser.com> References: <56B56114.1000401@a1poweruser.com> <20160206063406.GP46096@home.opsec.eu> <56B80099.3070606@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:42:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: port maintainer address From: Sergei Vyshenski To: qjail1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 04:42:58 -0000 Today the problem of email spam has a simple solution on your side: 1. If you run your own mail server, then http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is your best friend. 2. Quite a few free public mail services, e.g. https://mail.google.com, provide excellent spam filtering. So you can openly publish email address in plain text form (like FreeBSD project does) without any abuse from spammers. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:42 AM, qjail1 wrote: > > In todays world the normal, customary, and prudent methodology is to > protect a users email address from public view so its increasingly more > difficult for it to be harvested for targets of spam. I ask WHY is the > Freebsd ports system using a very old methodology that was designed over 20 > years ago, before the birth of spam. >