Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 03:13:08 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: "P.D. Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? Message-ID: <405A5734.9020605@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040319013951.522B079000F@ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20040319013951.522B079000F@ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
P.D. Seniura wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:02:42 +0100 > To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> > Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? > >>Paul Seniura wrote: >> >>>I don't want to discuss Intel compilers on AMD or whatever >>>else the issues are in the previous threads. >>> >>>I am posting this on the -ports forum because I am asking >>>about lang/icc* strictly as ports and how I will use them >>>as ports. >>> >>>[...] >>> >>>I will therefore absolutely oppose any such changes in >>>FreeBSD itself, in its default build configurations, in >>>its (binary or 'ready-to-run') distribution, and so on. >>> >>>Keep FreeBSD 'free' AND open-source. >>> >>>All of it. >> >>mkay, what was your question again? > > and your point -- ?? Understanding your post. You wanted to `ask about lang/icc* as ports', but *what*? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405A5734.9020605>