From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May 16 15:46:45 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D53237B40D
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 15:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id 17D64AE03F; Thu, 16 May 2002 15:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 15:46:42 -0700
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: current@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@supernews.net>
Subject: Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl
Message-ID: <20020516224641.GB496@elvis.mu.org>
References: <B9099FA5.F274%ade@supernews.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B9099FA5.F274%ade@supernews.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Ade Lovett wrote:
> Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the
> base system please?  A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally
> use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles.

I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always
simply use sed for this ?

Maxime

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message