From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 18 13:57:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6440116A404 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540D543D77 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D81014C0D0; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9E514BF2E; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:57:09 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:57:07 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E040F62CF@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Is Squirrelmail the best webmail choice? thread-index: AcZi7gQW7oFtr37kQ+K3swjnEi7VdQAAZ8nQ From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2006 13:57:09.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC4405E0:01C662EF] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: RE: Is Squirrelmail the best webmail choice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:57:17 -0000 > ive used squirrelmail for quite a while, and i just want to make sure i > have my mind as open as possible here. are there any other choices for > webmail that are about as easy as SM to configure, but offer a better user > interface or experience? >=20 > ive heard of horde, but ive not seen it since early 2000 or so, and even > then, when i tried to set it up, it was a complete and total failure. >=20 I used SM for a LONG time and recently switched to Horde. I like it A LOT better. Sure it was more work to get going, but its not terrible. They just fixed the horde ports so that your config doesn't get renamed when you upgrade, so that's a good thing! Start with horde and imp only, get that working, then add the other horde modules as you need them. The thing with SM is that it doesn't get updated enough (for me anyways). Sure little security updates, but theres been no movement on 1.5 in forever. =20 Horde has a TON of features, is fast, looks nice, handles procmail filters, etc. I like it! =3D)