From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 16 09:33:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: i386@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8221816A4E2; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5112C43D4C; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:33:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5F67B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.246.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7G9Glcv079852; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:16:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7G9XEfh017488; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from psbru.cec.eu.int (psbru.cec.eu.int [158.169.131.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20060816113314.8l1kbts740ss4wc4@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:14 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Divacky Roman MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: i386@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:33:13 -0000 Quoting Divacky Roman (from Wed, 16 Aug =20 2006 10:11:12 +0200): > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/fix.patch > > this fixes it, sorry about it This uipc_sem.c file is build as part of the module build. I don't =20 have the module excluded from my kernel builds, but it didn't break =20 when I compiled a kernel with the changes. Are different warn/error =20 flags for gcc active when building modules? I don't expect this and =20 I'm surprised my build went fine after seeing this error. I also don't =20 see ifdefs around those parts of the code, which may affect the build. >> [...] >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c: At top level: >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c:930: error: conflicting types for 'sem_exechook' >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c:74: error: previous declaration of =20 >> 'sem_exechook' was here Bye, Alexander. --=20 Just remember: when you go to court, you are trusting your fate to twelve people that weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137