Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:13:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238906] graphics/mesa-dri: Allow building without LLVM Message-ID: <bug-238906-7141-LkM3ewXg5E@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238906-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238906-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238906 --- Comment #21 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Nuno Teixeira from comment #19) Needing LLVM here, is not the same as needing clang/clang++ . The system only builds the clang/clang++ related material from LLVM, not the rest of it --not what mesa-dri uses. Being able to build a minimal mesa-dri for a type of context and being able to build a for-that-mesa-dri-only LLVM (no clang or clang++) would be a better fit to small arm boards, like the RPi4. My point overall here was just that comemnt #15's "base compiler" reference is not a valid direction based on what the system builds vs. not from what all LLVM allows to be built. mesa-dri is not trying to use clang/clang++ but is instead using library(s) from LLVM. Outside of that, the lists are probably a better place for discussion of the overall problem for your context, not here. I've sent a reply to your freebsd-arm list note that referenced here. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238906-7141-LkM3ewXg5E>