From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 11 10:20:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E916A40F; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CDC43D45; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AEB52F6B; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:20:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF1D9B9B0; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAAE4405B; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:21:06 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: security-officer@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061011102106.GY1594@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: freebsd security , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:20:11 -0000 Hi, On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:30:22AM -0700, FreeBSD Security Officer wrote: > Users of FreeBSD 4.11 systems are also reminded that that FreeBSD 4.11 > will reach its End of Life at the end of January 2007 and that they > should be making plans to upgrade or replace such systems. Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. For instance, according to Julian Elischer's posts, it seems he is still working on it. Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once more ? Thank you. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >