From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 17 10:38:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA23772 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.statsci.com (main.statsci.com [206.63.206.110]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA23766 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apple.statsci.com [206.63.206.4] with smtp by main.statsci.com with smtp (/\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.3 #3) id m0wHv3K-000ZNEC; Thu, 17 Apr 97 10:32 PDT Received: from apple.statsci.com [206.63.206.4] with smtp by apple.statsci.com with smtp (/\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.3 #3) id m0wHv3J-0006uMC; Thu, 17 Apr 97 10:32 PDT Message-Id: To: Doug White cc: Jeff Roberts , FreeBSD Questions Discussion List Subject: Re: XFree86 require upgrade 2.1.7 -> 2.2? References: In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:13:23 -0700." Reply-to: scott@statsci.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18982.861298376.1@apple.statsci.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:32:57 -0700 From: Scott Blachowicz Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Doug White wrote: > I had to do this in the 3.1.2 beta series when the Mach64's changed > chipset and the old release didn't work with them. It was > extract-and-copy for three or four cycles. Never a problem. Does that imply that the 3.2 release version of XF86_Mach64 works for you? When I try that (using the 3.2 XF86_Mach64 from the FreeBSD 2.1.6 CD on my FreeBSD 2.1.5 system), I get this weird color cycling and screwup behavior. I just take the 3.1.2 XF86_Mach64 and drop it into my 3.2 /usr/X11R6 tree and things work fine for me now. Any idea if that kind of behavior is known and/or fixed in 3.2A (or whatever)? Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 Mathsoft (Data Analysis Products Div) 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org