From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri May  3 06:25:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA26566
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 3 May 1996 06:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (tick.ssec.wisc.edu [144.92.108.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA26561
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 May 1996 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tick.ssec.wisc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA27333; Fri, 3 May 1996 08:23:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Dave Glowacki <dglo@SSEC.WISC.EDU>
Message-Id: <199605031323.IAA27333@tick.ssec.wisc.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Jim Dennis <jimd@mistery.mcafee.com>
cc: drbeck@onramp.net (David R. Beck), questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 13:39:39 PDT."
             <199605022039.NAA02271@mistery.mcafee.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 08:23:54 -0500
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	I suspect that this group is tired of hearing the "Linux vs. FreeBSD"
> 	debate (and my answer in particular).
> 
> 	Here's the summary of my opinion:
>		If you want to run a server (ftp, mail, web) and you want 
>		better security, closer adherence to BSD conventions and 
>		traditions (especially handy when you want an experienced
>		consultant to help with configuration, upgrades or 
>		troubleshooting) go with FreeBSD.

I'd change that "and" in the first line to an "or" and add something
like:

		If you want a system where development of the kernel and
		system applications are closely connected, and where the
		developers of the kernel and system apps are involved in
		the release process, go with FreeBSD.