From owner-freebsd-gnome Fri May 31 14:56:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from gyros.marcuscom.com (dhcp-64-102-60-60.cisco.com [64.102.60.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B757437B405 for ; Fri, 31 May 2002 14:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gyros.marcuscom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gyros.marcuscom.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4VLtRxB076650; Fri, 31 May 2002 17:55:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: (from marcus@localhost) by gyros.marcuscom.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4VLtRgh076649; Fri, 31 May 2002 17:55:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: gyros.marcuscom.com: marcus set sender to marcus@marcuscom.com using -f Subject: Re: pango broken with latest freetype? From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Franz Klammer Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1022881487.45242.74.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> References: <1022833144.771.31.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> <1022862065.50859.2.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1022869058.56451.13.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> <1022873704.70647.44.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1022877214.45242.36.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> <1022878085.70647.68.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1022881487.45242.74.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 31 May 2002 17:55:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1022882127.70647.99.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 17:44, Franz Klammer wrote: > > > > Okay, this is good info. The FreeBSD GNOME community has a choice to > > make then. Do we apply these patches to FT 2.1.0, and mess up Xinerama > > support, but allow older GNOME 1.4.x users to be happy, or go without > > the patches, and force GNOME 1.4.x users to either stay on FT 2.0.9, or > > deal with the rending problems in librsvg? Or, do we offer this as a > > compile-time option to users? Or, do we revert back to 2.0.9? > > > > i hope you don't want a answer to this questions from me :-)) > all joking aside - just to be realy shure there is no misunderstanding > because i'm maybee not clear enough: refering to "mess up Xinerama > support": the Xinerama support was never solved. neither with or without > your patches. It was a question to the whole FreeBSD GNOME community. Anyone that uses GNOME on FreeBSD is welcome to respond with their opinion. Your clarification on Xinerama support is good to know. I thought freetype-2.1.0 sans patches fixed things for you. Since it doesn't, keeping 2.1.0 with my patches, then upgrading GTK+-2.0 et al seems like a good idea. Joe > > > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message