From owner-cvs-all Tue Dec 4 5:58:58 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BC037B416 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 05:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with UUCP id fB4DwpC19052; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:58:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fB4Dw1AD038773; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:58:02 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fB4Dw1L06698; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:58:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fB4Dvrt75611; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:57:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:57:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Thomas Hurst Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem Splitting Branches with Procmail Message-ID: <20011204145752.B75379@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <20011203022809.D31748@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011203174307.GA79113@sploo.aagh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011203174307.GA79113@sploo.aagh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 05:43:08PM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > * Crist J . Clark (cjc@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > The "X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch:" header is specifically there for this use, > > so I assume some people are using it? Is there a way to configure > > procmail(1) to figure this out and get replies in the same box with > > the original message? I can think of some very elaborate ways to try > > to do this, but I don't like them. Any procmail wizards have come nice > > recipes for this? > > The cleanest solution for this imo is to have multiple lists - one for > each branch, with cvs-all subscribed to all messages (bit like zsh, > where it's zsh-announce -> zsh-users -> zsh-workers). Standard ml > filters would work then. What about '+' subaddressing. Say the logs are send to cvs-all+${branchname}@freebsd.org while the envelope userpart is striped after the first '+'. That way reactions automaticaly includes the branchname and everyone can filter. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message