From owner-freebsd-hubs Thu Jul 31 00:50:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA14011 for hubs-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA14006 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.6/8.6.9) id AAA14957; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707310745.AAA14957@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: freebsd-mirror@sol.cs.ritsumei.ac.jp CC: petzi@apfel.de, hubs@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <19922.870331233@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: releng22.freebsd.org From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * However, Satoshi's patches would appear to be embroiled in contraversy * or something since I haven't seen any signs that he's going to commit * them. :-( Um, I'm surprised that you think that way. There is no controversy, I was just waiting for Bruce to get back to me. (Which he did, I'm now going to test it.) I'll send it for one more round of reviews and then commit it. On a side note, when I posted the patch, I wasn't intending to commit it anytime soon, it was merely a "FYI" kind of message. Now it appears that the only person not very happy with the patch is me. Has anyone (besides Bruce) actually taken a look at that one? Don't people have anything to say about the horrible hacks to kick the build started on the temporary tree? ;) Satoshi