From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 29 14:50:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ctonet.it (mail.ctonet.it [212.110.160.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF2B37B422 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Received: from olgeni.olgeni (ppp-25.dial5.ctonet.it [212.110.180.25]) by mail.ctonet.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3021220B for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 23:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (bogus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgeni.olgeni (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4TLoRF50388 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 23:50:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 23:50:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: To: Subject: db, db3 and MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD Message-ID: <20010529231321.F49475-100000@olgeni.olgeni> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The databases/db and db3 ports build packages just fine, but the Makefile says: MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD= incompatible with libc internal db calls Does it mean that they will change libc's behavior in any way? Which functions would break? I guess that the linker would complain if it found the same function in two libraries, but I actually have no clue :) Even if this is the case, installing from a binary package should be no worse than compiling and installing the port as usual. Should these MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILDs go away? -- jimmy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message