From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 02:38:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD2D16A41F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:38:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED4043D45 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:38:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so79383wra for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FyuXWY24kfEdotgTIp+ykhmsKO8DiiV089N1ZZytY1Acj3HaSTvVSlXMpPqywuyuufDGsUnT/C620uc/Q8X7bww8/01Om7S6p/MzW2DkXHQaqLz05k5aLcguepe5cuCRkWB5/sXaaJLU0+chuxRdH0MN9eDT3eL/icF4SIt8r6s= Received: by 10.54.28.71 with SMTP id b71mr126388wrb; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:38:20 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: dpk In-Reply-To: <20050816122552.V18668@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050816122552.V18668@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Carstea Catalin Subject: Re: Stable server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:38:22 -0000 On 8/16/05, dpk wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Carstea Catalin wrote: >=20 > > what version of freebsd do u recomand for a stable server? >=20 > 4.11 is solid, hasn't shown any problems here. 5.4 is the best of the 5.x > series but we (I mean at my company, not speaking as a FreeBSD rep) > haven't put it through as much stress as we have 4.11 4.x compared to 5.x will always be more stable 5.x compared to 6.x will always be more stable 6.x compared to 7.x will al.... Do you see a trend? 4.x works now but what about in another year, two years, or three? Try running the last version of 3.x on today's hardware and software, 4.x is already having problems with hardware support. FreeBSD 6 already has a -STABLE and it's first release is just around the corner, It would be unwise to deploy 4.x unless specifically needed.... If you need to build the next Mars rover or a persons life depends on the system working then use 4.x, If your deploying a new web server or what not you want 5.x, possibly even 6.x if you can wait another month or two.