From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jul 14 21:13:21 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10728
          for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from www.video-collage.com (root@www.video-collage.com [206.15.171.132])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA10720
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from mi@xxx.video-collage.com)
Received: from xxx.video-collage.com (mi@xxx.video-collage.com [199.232.254.68])
	by www.video-collage.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA08680
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by xxx.video-collage.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id AAA13072
	for chat@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:13:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@video-collage.com>
Message-Id: <199807150413.AAA13072@xxx.video-collage.com>
Subject: Re: Stopping the bloody cross posting.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980714215913.4031B-100000@localhost> from Tim Vanderhoek at "Jul 14, 98 10:02:36 pm"
To: 
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:13:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Face: 
	%UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">
		 hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVih
		 y+z3/UR{6SCQ
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL35 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Tim Vanderhoek once stated:

=> Those people can then apply their own technology and replicate messages
=> locally, I think. There is no technical nor human reason/justification 
=> for the identical messages to be sent to the person more then once.

=It's no inconvenience for you to remove dups based on message-ID. 
=For the other side, however, you seem to forget that the one and
=only blessed field for filtering is Sender:, and last time I
=checked, each Sender: field lists only one -list address.  To
=follow-through your suggestion, the Sender: field would need to
=list multiple addresses...

First, I do not see anything wrong with Sender listing multiples.
Second, what's wrong with relying on To: and/or Cc:?

As a matter of fact, a custom X-Something header can be introduced
with all sorts of information needed for somebody's mail handling
scripts.

I just find it silly to duplicate messages on the hub, when they
can easily be replicated by the receiver (if he/she wants to) for
some sort of archiving. The Internet gets plenty of traffic from
dummies already...

	-mi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message