From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 12:33:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABB737B404 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA1B543F93 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:33:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 27367 invoked by uid 65534); 15 Jul 2003 19:33:27 -0000 Received: from p508E5BEC.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO galatea.local) (80.142.91.236) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 15 Jul 2003 21:33:27 +0200 Received: from tmm by galatea.local with local (Exim 4.20 #1) id 19cVa2-0000RA-R2; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:35:18 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:35:18 +0200 From: Thomas Moestl To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20030715193518.GA1660@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Marcel Moolenaar , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , current@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org References: <200307141153.h6EBrJKk045346@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <20030715175821.K34004@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030715185438.GB15674@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030715190456.GC15674@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030715190456.GC15674@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Thomas Moestl cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav cc: current@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:33:31 -0000 On Tue, 2003/07/15 at 12:04:56 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Marcel Moolenaar writes: > > > It needs to be analyzed because cross-builds should not fail. Do > > > we have a machine problem? What exactly is dumping core? Is it > > > gzip or some binary started immediately after it? If it's gzip, > > > is there a relation with the recent compiler warning about strncmp? > > > > It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build - > > the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except > > powerpc. > > It does not only happen to sparc64. I've seen it fail for all but > i386 and pc98, I think. i386 and pc98 have failed too (random example: July 5). - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C