Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:48:02 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re[2]: Ports conflicts: `lib/libiberty.a' Message-ID: <906455232.20031011114802@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031011014450.GA17491@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <22159707417.20031010130423@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F868513.4030607@gmx.net> <179171965963.20031010162842@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com> <1223794327.20031011004107@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20031011014450.GA17491@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Kris!
Saturday, October 11, 2003, 5:44:51 AM, you wrote:
>> I think, it is invalid situation. Because DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes
>> could afraid some users and here is no conflicts, really, but
>> overwriting of unused files.
KK> The invalid situation is two ports installing the same file. That is
KK> broken behaviour and should be fixed.
Yes, I agree with you. And I'll try to fix this behavior in my
binutils/gcc ports (and I'm maintaining 3 targets now -- mipsel-linux,
mingw32 and msp430). But I afraid, that it will be big and ugly
patches on Makefile.in files, which should be changed after each new
release :(
Lev Serebryakov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?906455232.20031011114802>