From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 11:13:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53D937B401; Sun, 11 May 2003 11:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE5743FDF; Sun, 11 May 2003 11:13:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4BICkVo017988; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:12:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h4BICkn8017987; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:12:46 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030511181246.GA17879@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030510145729.E5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030509193208.U8248@albert.gate5.de> <20030510145729.E5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030511103610.GA16833@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_OPENSSL depends on /usr/lib/libcrypto.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 18:13:41 -0000 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:55:43PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Stijn Hoop schrieb:, > > I still think bsd.openssl.mk would be great if integrated in the main > > bsd.port.mk file. See my message with subject 'bsd.openssl.mk' with mes= sage > > id <20030506181002.GA91666@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>. > >=20 > > I also think that ports installing into /usr can be useful, but I'd rat= her > > avoid it if I can. I think a check for an optional component of the sys= tem > > (NO_OPENSSL in /etc/make.conf) should not be unconditional. > >=20 > > Unfortunately, I do not have patches to integrate bsd.openssl.mk... >=20 > I have them sumitted in June 2002: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/39054 >=20 > The last followup is still up to date. Great! What happened to this PR then? Sorry to bother you during a soft por= ts freeze, Kris, but I was hoping your bento-exp runs could include this the n= ext run? --Stijn --=20 "...I like logs. They give me a warm fuzzy feeling. I've been known to keep logs for 30 months at a time (generally when I thought I was rotating them daily, but was actually rotating them once a month)." -- Michael Lucas, in Big Scary Daemons article 'Controlling Bandwidth' --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+vpKeY3r/tLQmfWcRAnzpAJ0bmNWTzyWpmu5P3sm3u859fNLqWQCgrAg7 r4RNyVtlMv1+1aKa/TOoX/Q= =Hvjf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--