From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 21 18:33:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184451065673 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB43B8FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from sarevok.dnr.servegame.org (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C786C7E840; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:33:52 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:33:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.2; i386; ; ) References: <200904211106.01965.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <200904212023.14365.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <344D9702-C894-4E54-B256-43FAB17903F1@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <344D9702-C894-4E54-B256-43FAB17903F1@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904212033.51524.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Preventing ntpd from adjusting time (backwards) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:33:54 -0000 On Tuesday 21 April 2009 20:29:18 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Mel Flynn wrote: > > Now I'm also wondering how ntpd handles securelevel 2. > > "man init" suggests that stepping the clock by more than a second is > disallowed: yes, so does it bail or retry till skew wins over the failed steps? -- Mel